Lecture 1 – Part 2

FROM CENTRE TO PERIPHERY

Disease ka within se outward movement — yani jab disease important aur vital organs se less important organs ki taraf move kare — generally “from centre to periphery” kehlata hai.

Lekin isko samajhne se pehle ek aur important question ka answer zaroori hai:

Q : Prescribing karte waqt humara target kya hona chahiye? Body as a whole? Totality? Ya Centre?

Agar humara target disease ko within se outward move karna hai — yani centre se periphery — toh hume centre ko pakadna padega.

Kyunki is case me force centre ke peeche se apply karni hogi taaki centre reinforce hokar disease ko outward push kar sake.

Ab centre kahan hai?

Iska answer mushkil nahi hai agar hum homoeopathic literature me scattered facts ko dhyan se dekhein.Homoeopathy me literature ki koi kami nahi hai jo yeh indicate kare ki centre “WILL” aur “UNDERSTANDING” hai.

Yani willing aur thinking — jo memory ke support se operate karte hai — wahi actual man ko constitute karte hai.Dusre words me: Yahi uska mind hai.

Kent’s Repertory ka MIND section bhi isi fact ki taraf clear indication deta hai.

Aur homoeopathy me treat patient ko kiya jata hai, disease ko nahi.Dusre words me: Mind ko balance karna hai, physical condition ko nahi.Aur jab mind balance hota hai toh automatically body bhi balance hone lagti hai.

Aap shayad mere saath agree karenge ki homoeopathic literature me jo phrase baar baar aata hai — “innermost in man” — uska indication actual me mind hi hai.Man me mind se zyada innermost aur kuch nahi hai.Isi liye kaha jata hai ki medicine ko sabse pehle mind improve karna chahiye.

Disease ka movement:

Mind → Physicals hona chahiye.

Isi liye, kyunki movement within se outward start hota hai aur uska starting point mind hai, automatically mind ko “centre” kehne ka right mil jata hai.

Centre ka yeh description scattered homoeopathic facts par based hai.

Aur kyunki available homoeopathic literature ka kaafi part philosophical raha hai, isliye yeh explanation bhi largely philosophical hai.Lekin author ke according unhone isko scientifically explain karne ki bhi koshish ki hai, jiska detailed scientific version woh alag treatise me explain karenge.

Ab original topic par wapas aate hai.

Ek ajeeb anomaly hai homoeopathic philosophy me:

Ek taraf hum “centre to periphery” principle preach karte hai, aur dusri taraf prescribing ke waqt centre ko completely bhool kar totality ko target karte hai.

Totality ka matlab generally yeh maana jata hai ki: Head to toe saare symptoms ko aggregate karke ek picture banayi jaye aur us picture ko drug pictures se match kiya jaye.

Ek ke baad ek remedies fit ki jati hai jab tak koi action na mil jaye.

Agar yeh approach fail ho jaye toh:Sulphur Psorinum Thuja jaise miasmatic keys try ki jaati hai.Aur agar tab bhi response na aaye toh case ko hopeless treat kar diya jata hai.

Lekin author ke according:Totality ek poora field hai. Ek poora territory hai.Jabki centre ek particular point hai — jaise kisi state ki capital. Aur naturally: Capital ko capture karna poore territory ko capture karne se easier hota hai. Territory ki exact length aur breadth uncertain ho sakti hai. Lekin capital definite hoti hai.Isi liye centre ko target banana zyada exact aur scientific hai. Bas condition yeh hai ki physician ko centre ke signals identify karna aana chahiye.

Continue .