HOMOEOPATHIC LAWS (A NEW CONCEPT)
Homoeopathy ko ek medical science ke roop me tab tak recognise nahi kiya ja sakta jab tak woh apni therapeutics me certainty attain na kar le — present “hit and trial” method ke substitute ke roop me. Usko aisi direction develop karni hogi jo use ek definite path aur destination ki taraf le jaye.
Ek homoeopathic physician ko, homoeopathic medicine prescribe karne se pehle hi, yeh foresee aur perceive karna chahiye ki uski prescription kya karne wali hai. Woh expect kya karta hai ? ki disease kis direction me move karegi? Kaunse symptoms reduce honge aur kis tareeke se honge? Patient ko kya expect karne ko bola jayega? Patient ko kab report karna zaroori hoga? Aur kab report karna zaroori nahi hoga, balki next remedy indicate hone tak wait karna hoga?
Ab tak yeh possible kyun nahi ho paya?
Kyuki theory me hum laws ki baat karte aaye hai. Woh undoubtedly scientific hai:
- Law of Similars
- Hering’s Law of Cure — centre se periphery ki taraf, above downward, aur symptoms reverse order me disappear hona
- One remedy, one dose at a time.
Lekin prescribing ke waqt, shayad hi humme se kisi ne in laws ki importance ko practically grasp aur realize kiya ho.
Remedy prescribe karne ke baad, kya disease actually in laws ke according move hui? Har case me? Agar nahi hui toh kyun nahi hui? Aur agar disease ka direction in laws ke according nahi tha, toh kya usko phir bhi homoeopathic cure maana jana chahiye?
Iske bajaye, practice me hum disease ke causes ki inquiry me lag gaye. Yeh inquiries hume philosophical conclusions tak le gayi — jaise “Miasms” — aur humne unhe prescribing ka basis bana liya. Wahin shayad hum apna raasta bhool gaye. Woh scientific inquiry ka raasta tha.
Science kya hai?
Science kisi bhi inquiry me certainty, exactness aur analytical approach introduce karta hai. Science apne conclusions ko tests ke through justify karta hai. Unverified truth, truth nahi hota. Untested science, science nahi hoti.
Homoeopathy ki scientific nature tabhi establish ho sakti hai jab har case me, remedy dene ke baad, woh khud ko similar prove kare. Aur uska proof yeh hona chahiye ki disease centre se periphery move kare, symptoms reverse order me disappear kare aur movement above downward ho.
Mere readers ko shayad yeh ajeeb lage ki maine jo ab tak bola hai woh unke liye naya nahi hai. Is point tak unki disappointment kuch had tak justified bhi ho sakti hai. Lekin aage ki lines me shayad unhe yeh jaan kar surprise ho ki laws naye nahi hai, lekin meri conception of these laws meri knowledge ke hisaab se bilkul nayi hai aur ab tak duniya me kisi ko maloom nahi hai.
Ab shuruaat karte hai ek basic question se:
WHAT IS A SIMILAR?
Hamare profession me generally yahi maana gaya hai ki medicine ke symptoms aur patient ke symptoms match ho gaye toh similar mil gaya.
Lekin ek important baat overlook ho gayi:
Agar remedy actual true similar hai, toh usko similar ki tarah behave bhi karna chahiye.
Similars ka behaviour universally known hai — jab do similar forces opposite direction me place ki jaati hai toh woh ek dusre ko repel karti hai. Aakhir me jo zyada powerful hoti hai woh dominant ho jaati hai. Initial resistance ke baad stronger force prevail karti hai aur repel karti hai.
Isi tarah, agar kisi case me actual homoeopathic similar prescribe hua hai, toh proof ke roop me yeh observe hona chahiye ki disease outward repel ho rahi hai.
Yeh repulsions body ke natural outlets se expulsions ke roop me appear hongi:
- Nose se coryza
- Eyes se lachrymation
- Urethra se urine ya discharge
- Anus se stools, mucus, blood, worms etc.
- Skin se eruptions, ulceration, sweat etc.
Disease ko andar suppress nahi hona chahiye, balki outward move karna chahiye.
continue…..
Leave a Reply